Showing posts with label #Equality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #Equality. Show all posts

Sunday, 12 July 2020

BLM: Watching America From North of the Border

Like many Canadians, I am watching in horror as our neighbour falls into chaos and disorder. And, after reading so many Tweets and news posts about what is going on down there, I feel moved to ponder the situation.  
What I am seeing is a country built on slave labour, that fought a brutal and bloody civil war before slavery could be abolished. And even with the abolition of slavery, many continued to treat people of colour as inferior. 
Then there was a civil rights movement, which demanded that people, black and white (and brown) be treated equally under the law. And some changes were made to the laws. But legal changes alone do not change the way people think. 
And there are other levers of power besides the law. Under-funding certain schools, suppressing some people's votes, not having the political will to ensure all people have access to a living wage and health care and housing... 
Combined with a police force that started out as slave-catchers and, in many places, continued that culture within their ranks, all encouraged by a wealthy class that holds the lion's share of political power in the country... 
This has led to gross inequality, and discrimination. And instead of progressing from the victories of the Civil Rights Movement, the US has slid back, in temperament and outlook. There are laws to protect black citizens, but they are not observed. 
Police who kill are seldom sanctioned. Fear of the "other" has grown, not receded. Black people are killed almost every day in the US by police. And the number of cases of black people being killed while doing nothing wrong grows and grows. 
And the media helpfully feed the notion that, well, if he or she wasn't doing anything wrong this time, they probably did something in the past... It seems like any past transgression can be turned into a crime punishable by death, if it happens the person is black 
Which has led to the "........ while black" - it could be grocery shopping, or talking on the phone, driving a car, sleeping in your own home. It is a terrible, sick way to treat a segment of your population. And this has been going on and growing for a long time. 
It is no wonder people are taking to the streets in protest of this (yet another) innocent man killed for being black in America. 
And now it seems a lot of the violence, the property damage, that is happening when peaceful protest turns violent, is being instigated by people not involved with Black Lives Matter. It has been suggested that white supremacists are involved. 
This makes some sense. What would white supremacists, like Proud Boys and the KKK want to accomplish? Well, if they can gin up a lot of violence around these protests, they can get regular Americans to turn against BLM, and begin to adopt more racist views. 
They can begin to discredit black Americans whenever they try to organize or push for greater fairness and equality. They could get more supporters, gain more sympathy from legislative bodies. 
And then there is the theory that undercover police are also instigating violence, masquerading as protestors. And what could they possibly gain? Well, proof that their Blue brethren were right to be treated as above the law, because look how dangerous BLM is? 
And who else has something to gain? Well, Trump tweeted that he is going to make "Antifa" an illegal terrorist organisation. Because, he says, Antifa is behind the violence and any outside agitators. 
It doesn't matter that "Antifa" is not an organisation, just a concept, a movement, a loosely connected scattering of like-minded people who do not want to see totalitarianism take over. Antifa, after all, just means anti-fascist. Which should be everyone's default state. 
This could give the GOP-controlled government the power to crack down on any and all protests. To make being anti-fascist illegal, makes it impossible to criticise anything the government does. Because, clearly, the GOP has distinctly fascist tendencies. 
And, as the police break heads and shoot at protesters, and target journalists and medics working with the injured, the President is contemplating making himself secure, and enabling his administration to do anything, anything they want. 
I read that the only reason there are not heavy tanks in the streets of most American cities right now is that they would damage the roads. Not that innocent people could be killed. No. Simply because infrastructure could be damaged. That speaks volumes. 
I want to be very clear about all this. I am not saying this because I think Canada has no racism. Canada does have racists. Many of them are supporters of the GOP's little brother party, the CPC. 
While we watch America burn, we in Canada should be taking this as a lesson. Racism is a powerful tool that can be exploited by the far right. It can be used to create conflict and then justify draconian measures to suppress that conflict.
Measures that can be used to suppress any and all dissent. Measures that can mark an end to democracy. 
As the US teeters on the brink of totalitarianism, we in Canada must think deeply about what kind of future we want for our country. We must take care not to let the door open to the kind of inequality, injustice, and unbridled brutality we are seeing unfolding in the US. 
We must take care to not let parties who foment hatred of the other, who try to make us mistrust and hate, form government. There is no room for "barbaric cultural practices" tip-lines, or racially motivated crime in our society.
We must stand on guard for Canada, now more than ever, and not let our country go down to darkness as we are seeing our neighbour do. It's time for Canadians to speak out about racism, to stand up to it. For all our children, and our children's children. 

Friday, 21 June 2019

Media Literacy: Why Did Andrew Scheer Say That? (Religion & Politics should not mix)

Media Literacy: Seldom have we witnessed a federal party leader alienate so many Canadians in the opening line of a speech. Likely meant to be somewhat conciliatory, or comforting, Scheer's speech is anything but. 
As soon as he utters the words, "children of God", the hair stands up on the backs of many people's necks. Why is this, you ask? First, in a diverse, multicultural country, we don't talk a lot about faith. That's not because it is not allowed, but because the threat of one faith group imposing their will on other faith groups, or people who do not belong to any faith group, is ever-present in this world. Indeed, we only need look to the south to see how the lines between church and state have blurred. 
That is the second reason. Canadians generally prefer a government that bases policy and decision-making on empirical evidence, not 2,000 year old texts. As soon as you signal that you are drawing government and religion together, you raise the question of "which religion"? Scheer is, of course, Christian and would be referencing his god. You can't pretend that different religions have got along fabulously over the millennia. 
Even those that have much the same teachings and outlook have been slaughtering each other throughout history because they cannot overcome the deeply held conceit that their religion is better and all others must be subjugated and eliminated. Even within Christianity there have been long and bloody wars between different sects. 
Roman Catholics and Protestants are the most obvious example, but the history of Christianity is rife with violent disagreements between branches of the same faith. And the same is true of most other world religions. 
One of the many great things about Canada is we do not have state-enforced religion, nor do we prevent people from following the faith of their choosing, or no faith at all, provided that faith does not infringe upon the rights of others. 
We see in the US how the religious right has brought religious doctrine into law-making. Most recently in the anti-abortion legislation in several states. But religious opinion permeates more and more of their legislative motives 
We do not need, or want, our government to be driven by what they feel is their religious values. We saw the Harper Government base legislation on opinion instead of best practices/empirical evidence. Many of these laws are now overturned or still challenged in the courts. 
Furthermore, if we allow any party that has professed an adherence to a particular religion to gain power, we risk the rights of those who are not of that faith. We must not allow any religion to become entrenched in the governance of our country. 
And yes, the preamble to our charter of rights and freedoms does say, "Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law", this is to prevent Canada from becoming an enforced atheistic state, like the Soviet Union. 
It is important to recall that this document was written during the cold war. The phrase is an artifact of a different time. So, don't flame me about this. Read this instead: exhibits.library.utoronto.ca/exhibits/show/… 
So, what is Andrew Scheer doing when he uses the term "children of God" in a speech to the Canadian people? Several things, actually. First, he demonstrates his adherence to his religion to the religious people in his base.
Second, he attempts to make people feel comforted that, because he is a religious man, he would not discriminate against others. However, there is a long history of missionaries and governments punishing "children of God" for not following the right religion. 
Usually couched in the language of "saving souls", there was an inherent notion of the value of people, coupled with horror that they were wasting their valuable soul, A "hate the sin, but not the sinner" line that justified all manner of cruelty. 
I, for one, take zero comfort in the idea that Scheer feels the need to point out that he is guided by his Christian principles. It says to me that he is appallingly tone-deaf about the reality of Canada. 
He goes on to say that those who see some as inferior because of race, religion, gender or sexual orientation are not welcome. Yet... It was only after a week of public outcry that Scheer acted to remove Michael Cooper, the CPC MP who read the Christchurch shooter's manifesto into the record of a Parliamentary committee while telling a Muslim Association witness that he should "be ashamed". And he did not remove Cooper from the position of deputy Justice Critic, or from CPC caucus... 
No, he just removed Cooper from a seat on the committee, which is wrapping up in 3 weeks anyway. So, exactly how much credence do we give to Scheer's professed intolerance for intolerance? 20/25
How long was Conservative Lynn Beyak allowed to remain as a Conservative caucus member after making remarks defending residential schools? Posting racist letters on her website? Even in addressing the issue, which had prompted public outcry... 
Scheer removed her from caucus because she would not remove "certain comments" that said Indigenous People were lazy. Presumably, if she had done as she was directed, she would still be a member of the CPC caucus.  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynn_Beyak
This begs the question, is Beyak's offence in Scheer's eyes being a racist, or not following orders? In analysing political speech, we must consider how the words being spoken align with actual behaviour. 
Is Michael Cooper's offence being a racist, or drawing bad publicity? Or was he just the hapless bearer of a CPC trial balloon that was rejected by the Canadian public? Do the CPC's own communications align with a "universal equality" outlook? 
I offer this CPC ad as an example of the official CPC view of the equality of all people, the "equal and infinite value in all of us..." 
Returning to the original statement that is the theme of this thread, there was no need for Scheer to reference God. This was not an off-the-cuff impassioned statement. 
This was carefully worded and rehearsed, as evidenced by how proud Scheer seems to be of himself when he makes it through the whole thing. 
There was a reason, or reasons, the CPC chose to make a religious reference here. I cannot think of any that bode well for Canadian society under a Scheer-led government. 
As a post-script, this is the original photo the CPC cropped and photoshopped for their ad. As you can see, the man is travelling with his family, walking towards a reception centre, not sneaking through a hole in a fence. Needs to be shown, the ad misrepresented reality.