Gun Violence and Gun
Control
July 17, 2012
Wow. Two guys got into
an argument at a community barbecue in Toronto and pulled out guns
and started shooting at each other. Two people are dead, a 14 year
old girl, and a 23 year old guy. Twenty-one other people are injured,
including a two-year-old.
People who support mass
gun ownership and people being armed in public places say everyone is
safer if everyone is armed because someone will shoot troublemakers
before anyone else gets hurt. Both these guys had guns. Seems they
managed to shoot lots of other people without actually hitting each
other. Had there been other people there with guns and a mindset
that they should use them to put a stop to this, I postulate that the
carnage would have been even greater. Real life is not like the
movies. Even if Bruce Willis' characters, or Clint Eastwoods' or Vin
Diesel's or any other action hero you can think of, can pick off
someone in a crowd with deadly accuracy, that does not mean the
average Joe with a gun can do the same. It's a movie. Everyone is
where they are supposed to be, and the bullets aren't real.
Real crowds move
erratically, especially when everyone starts to panic. People were
trampled in the rush to get out of the area. There was, I imagine,
total chaos. Unless you are a trained sharp-shooter, the chances of
actually being able to get a clean shot at a perpetrator are probably
a lot lower than being hit by lightening. The chances of hitting an
innocent by-stander or someone lurching wildly through the scene
trying to get away, on the other hand, seem pretty darn good. Even
sharp-shooters and snipers miss sometimes.
Gun proponents would
say that gun control regulations did not prevent these two
individuals from bringing guns to a barbecue. This is true. It
shows that a lot more needs to be done to prevent illegal weapons
from getting into Canada. A lot more needs to be done to prevent
legally owned guns from falling into the hands of criminals after
being stolen as well. Arming average citizens is so not the answer.
We just can't have random people trying to be vigilantes. Even
people who score pretty well shooting targets at a shooting range are
totally unqualified to draw a weapon and fire it in an emergency. The
additional risk to everyone around, and to the shooter himself or
herself, is just too high.
The scenario of a
gunman, or gunmen, opening fire in a crowd, is horrific. It should
never happen. But if it does, the last thing anyone needs is some
would-be Rambo trying to shoot the bad guys.
What this event teaches
us, once again, is that the flow of illegal guns into Canada (mostly
from the US) needs to be far more closely monitored and prevented. I
am far more concerned about guns and other weapons coming across the
border than drugs. And yet, while we hear a lot about drug busts at
the border, and while that seems to be what border officers are
looking for when they pull your luggage or vehicle apart, you don't
hear a lot about shipments of guns being intercepted. Storage of
legal guns in homes and commercial enterprises needs to be enhanced
so they cannot be stolen. A gun safe should be as impenetrable as a
money safe, and as heavy. I get having a long gun for hunting and
protecting your livestock from predators. Ok, I don't really get
hunting, but I accept that some people really like doing that. But
there has to be safeguards to keep weapons out of the hands of people
who would use them against other people.
We need to take
firearms out of the crime equation. Yes, a deranged person with a
knife is pretty scary too, but they have to get close to do any real
damage. A gun can kill from a distance, and a bullet can fly stray or
ricochet, as is evidenced by this tragedy in Toronto last night.. And
while there are many good reasons to own a knife – to cut food, for
instance – there are few, if any, good reasons for the average
citizen to own a hand-gun.
No comments:
Post a Comment